Skip to the content.

January 9, 2022 Analysis of Omicron hospitalizations for US states

The characteristic signature of recent rapid growth due to Omicron is visible in all US state case history data.

For some states, testing capacity limits have changed the fraction of infections that are reported as cases, making interpretation of cases much more difficult. Further complicating matters is the usual effect of holiday periods disrupting testing and reporting. Hospital admission data can be used when cases are no longer reliable.

The analysis presented here, fits multi-strain models to case data in each state and use hospital data to compare Omicron to Delta in terms of:

The case and hospital data are not broken down by variant. Instead, the multi-strain model fit uses the characteristic signature of rapidly growing cases to describe the transition from Delta to Omicron cases, and parameters for the relative severity and duration are fit for each state.

Using all state data, the mean severity is 0.38 with a standard deviation of 0.14, indicating that Omicron infections are less severe than Delta infections. The mean ratio of durations is 1.1 with a standard deviation of 0.3, indicating that the duration of treatment does not appear to be significantly shorter for Omicron hospitalizations.

Some states appear to have reached peak hospitalization, while most are several weeks away from that point.

Individual state projections

For this analysis, the case and death data source is the New York Times, since it has has more regular updates and fewer irregularities than the JHU data.

The plots for each state below show the case, hospitalization, and deaths data since August 2021 (left) and since November 15 2021 (right). The maximum vertical axis values for cases are 500/100k (left) and 200/100k (right). Daily hospital admissions and deaths are scaled up by 20 to be able to see them on a single plot.

The infection model is defined by fitting the model to the case data, and the hospitalization and deaths models are derived from the infection model.

The Omicron variant is assumed to have a much larger susceptible population, due to its ability to evade immunity (natural and vaccination immunity). For this study, those immunized against earlier strains only have 20% effective immunity against omicron.

The Omicron variant is assumed to produce many more infections that go undetected as cases. The reporting fraction of omicron infections is assumed to be 0.4 times that of Delta infections. This has the effect of reducing peak infection and hospitalization rates.

The green points are the daily cases, the grey points the daily hospitalizations, the teal points are hospital occupancy, and the indigo points are the daily deaths. The larger circles are weekly averages to help guide the eye.

The case data are used to define the periods for which transmission rate appears to be constant. The vertical lines show where the transmission rate is changed. If the susceptibe fraction is constant (immunity not changing quickly), constant transmission rates lead to steady exponential growth or decline. With immunity growing, the curves bend downwards due to the herd effect. Interpretting the growth of omicron with changing delta rates growth rates leads to additional uncertainty in the interpretations.

The curves are the model expectations for cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, and all three are determined from the case data. The severity is estimated from the hospital admission data, and its value is shown in the legend. The hospital durations (mean Omicron duration and mean Delta duration) are estimated from the hospital occupancy data, and the ratio (Omicron divided by Delta) is shown in the legend. Omicron and Delta hospital parameters can both be estimated from these data only because of the different relative prevalence by date, as indicated by the fits to the case data.

There is insufficient data to estimate the relative death rates for Omicron and Delta infections. The model curve assumes an odds-ratio of 0.2, with a band spanning the range 0.1-0.3.

Alaska

ak

Alabama

al

Arkansas

ar

Arizona

az

California

ca

Colorado

co

Connecticut

ct

District Of Columbia

dc

Delaware

de

Florida

fl

Georgia

ga

Hawaii

hi

Iowa

ia

Idaho

id

Illinois

il

Indiana

in

Kansas

ks

Kentucky

ky

Louisiana

la

Massachusetts

ma

Maryland

md

Maine

me

Michigan

mi

Minnesota

mn

Missouri

mo

Mississippi

ms

Montana

mt

North Carolina

nc

North Dakota

nd

Nebraska

ne

New Hampshire

nh

New Jersey

nj

New Mexico

nm

Nevada

nv

New York

ny

Ohio

oh

Oklahoma

ok

Oregon

or

Pennsylvania

pa

Puerto Rico

pr

Rhode Island

ri

South Carolina

sc

South Dakota

sd

Tennessee

tn

Texas

tx

Utah

ut

Virginia

va

Vermont

vt

Washington

wa

Wisconsin

wi

West Virginia

wv

Wyoming

wy

return to case studies